Facts of the Case
Agnes Deirdre Morrissey-Berru was an teacher at Our Lady of Guadalupe School and brought a claim against the school under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the school on the basis that Morrissey-Berru was a “minister.” In Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC, the Supreme Court first recognized a ministerial exception, which exempts religious institutions from anti-discrimination laws in hiring employees deemed “ministers.”
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court, finding that Morrissey-Berru was not a “minister”; she had taken one course on the history of the Catholic church but otherwise did not have any religious credential, training, or ministerial background. Given that she did not hold herself out to the public as a religious leader or minister, the court declined to classify her as a minister for the purposes of the ministerial exception.
Questions
Do the First Amendment’s religion clauses prevent civil courts from adjudicating employment-discrimination claims brought by an employee against her religious employer, when the employee carried out important religious functions but was not otherwise a “minister”?
Conclusions
-
The “ministerial exception,” which derives from the religion clauses of the First Amendment, prevents civil courts from adjudicating the former employee's discrimination claims in this case, and in the consolidated case, St. James School v. Biel, against the religious schools that employed them. Justice Samuel Alito authored the 7-2 majority opinion.
Courts generally try to stay out of matters involving employment decisions regarding those holding certain important positions with churches and other religious institutions, and the Court formally first recognized this principle, known as the “ministerial exception,” in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & School v. EEOC. In that case, the Court considered four factors before reaching its conclusion that the employee was a “minister” for purposes of an exception to generally applicable anti-discrimination laws. However, the Court expressly declined “to adopt a rigid formula for deciding when an employee qualifies as a minister.” The factors relied upon in Hosanna-Tabor were specific to that case, and courts may consider different factors to decide whether another employee is a “minister” in another context. The key inquiry is what the employee does. Educating young people in their faith, which was the responsibility of the plaintiffs in these two cases, is at the very core of a private religious school’s mission, and as such, Morrissey-Berru and Biel qualify for the exception recognized in Hosanna-Tabor.
Justice Clarence Thomas authored a concurring opinion, in which Justice Neil Gorsuch joined, arguing that courts should “defer to religious organizations’ good-faith claims that a certain employee’s position is ‘ministerial.’”
Justice Sonia Sotomayor authored a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined, arguing that the Court incorrectly classified the teachers as “ministers,” given that the teachers taught primarily secular subjects, lacked substantial religious titles and training, and were not even required to be Catholic. Moreover, Justice Sotomayor argued, the majority’s approach “has no basis in law and strips thousands of schoolteachers of their legal protections.”
Further analysis of the oral argument available at Oral Argument 2.0: https://argument2.oyez.org/2020/our-lady-of-guadalupe-v-morrisey-berru-consolidated-with-st-james-school-v-biel/
Our Lady Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
featuring Nathan Chapman
On May 11, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court heard argument in the consolidated cases Our...
Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
featuring Daniel Blomberg
On July 8, 2020 the Supreme Court decided Our Lady of Guadalupe v. Morrissey Berru....
Religious Schools and the Ministerial Exception
On Monday, the Court heard oral argument in two important First Amendment cases—Our Lady of...
Does The First Amendment Allow States To Require Religious Organizations To Pay for Abortions?
New York issued a new mandate that requires houses of worship to pay for abortions....
Credentials Not Required: Why an Employee’s Significant Religious Functions Should Suffice to Trigger the Ministerial Exception
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
An Extended Essay on Church Autonomy
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
The doctrine of church autonomy[1] is distinct from the two more familiar lines of cases...
Religious Schools, Collective Bargaining, & the Constitutional Legacy of NLRB v. Catholic Bishop
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
It would be difficult to find a corner of American labor law more anomalous than...
We Are Free for a Reason
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A review of Free to Believe: The Battle Over Religious Liberty in America, by Luke...
State Court Docket Watch: DeWeese-Boyd v. Gordon College
Note from the Editor: Mr. Lorence's organization, Alliance Defending Freedom, was retained by Gordon College to...
State Court Docket Watch: Woods v. Seattle Union Gospel Mission
Washington Supreme Court Issues Mixed Ruling on Religious Employer Exemption
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Last Hurrah for the Minimalist Court?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
A review of SCOTUS 2020: Major Decisions and Developments of the U.S. Supreme Court, edited...
After Espinoza, What’s Left of the Establishment Clause?
Federalist Society Review, Volume 21
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
The Establishment Clause: Its Original Public Meaning and What We Can Learn From the Plain Text
Federalist Society Review, Volume 22
Modern times in church-state relations began in 1947 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Everson...