Facts of the Case
Fourteen leaders of the Communist Party in the state of California were tried and convicted under the Smith Act. That Act prohibited willfully and knowingly conspiring to teach and advocate the overthrow of the government by force. This case was decided in conjunction with Richmond v. United States and Schneiderman v. United States.
Questions
Did the Smith Act violate the First Amendment?
Conclusions
-
In a 6-to-1 decision, the Court reversed the convictions and remanded the cases to a District Court for retrial. The Court interpreted the Smith Act in the following manner: First, the term "organize" was construed to mean the creation of a new organization, making the Act inapplicable to subsequent organizational acts. Second, the Court drew a distinction between the "advocacy and teaching of forcible overthrow as an abstract principle" and the "advocacy and teaching of concrete action for the forcible overthrow of the Government." The Court recognized that instances of speech that amounted to "advocacy of action" were "few and far between."
Yates v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 11-21-14 featuring Todd Braunstein
On November 5, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Yates v. United States....
Yates v. United States - Post-Decision SCOTUScast
SCOTUScast 3-17-15
On February 25, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Yates v. United States....
Something Fishy in Sarbanes-Oxley? Yates v. United States - Podcast
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
At issue in Yates v. United States is the "anti-shredding" provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act...
Florida Fisherman off the Hook for Sarbanes-Oxley Violation: Supreme Court decides Yates v. United States - Podcast
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Podcast
In a 4-1-4 decision issued on February 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court held...
The Fisherman Case
Short video with Orin Kerr discussing Yates v. United States
Prof. Orin Kerr previews the upcoming Supreme Court case Yates v. United States, which concerns whether...
The SCOTUS Tax Case to Watch: Marinello v. United States
The National Law Journal recently called Marinello v. United States one of eight “major SCOTUS...
Overcriminalization: Administrative Regulation, Prosecutorial Discretion, and the Rule of Law
Engage Volume 15, Issue 2
Introduction Criminal law is the biggest, scariest tool in the arsenal of governmental powers:...
Lessons in Reading Law: Rimini Street v. Oracle’s Duel Over “Full Costs”
Federalist Society Review, Volume 20
Note from the Editor: The Federalist Society takes no positions on particular legal and public...
Power Failures: Prosecution, Power, and Problems
Engage Volume 16, Issue 3
I. Introduction: Prosecution, Power, and Problems Prosecutors wield an awesome power. They make the first...