Courthouse Steps: Salman v. U.S. Oral Arguments
![](https://images.fedsoc.org?fit=scale-down&width=712&image=https://fedsoc-cms-public.s3.amazonaws.com/events/MJ8bcECxoUlrB3W5k7xMFp0WLIVvtrk6wKhnmKyi.jpeg-712x251)
Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group Teleforum
On Wednesday, October 5, the Supreme Court heard argument in Salman v. U.S. on what constitutes a personal benefit in insider trading. The Court will consider the Ninth Circuit’s holding in this matter that a personal benefit can be established by the fact that a tippee shared a close family relationship. The Second Circuit previously held in United States v. Newman that a personal benefit to an insider necessary to establish insider trading under Dirks v. SEC requires proof of “an exchange that is objective, consequential, and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature.”
Featuring:
- Todd F. Braunstein, Global Head of Legal Investigations, Willis Towers Watson
On Wednesday, October 5, the Supreme Court heard argument in Salman v. U.S. on what constitutes a personal benefit in insider trading. The Court will consider the Ninth Circuit’s holding in this matter that a personal benefit can be established by the fact that a tippee shared a close family relationship. The Second Circuit previously held in United States v. Newman that a personal benefit to an insider necessary to establish insider trading under Dirks v. SEC requires proof of “an exchange that is objective, consequential, and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature.”
Featuring:
- Todd F. Braunstein, Global Head of Legal Investigations, Willis Towers Watson
Call begins at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
Teleforum calls are open to all dues paying members of the Federalist Society. To become a member, sign up here. As a member, you should receive email announcements of upcoming Teleforum calls which contain the conference call phone number. If you are not receiving those email announcements, please contact us at 202-822-8138.